* Add secrets module * Address Greptile feedback for secrets module * Handle unavailable secrets in provider adapter * Address path combine review comments * Address additional Greptile secrets review * Address final Greptile secrets feedback * Handle secrets test payload failures * address greptile feedback on secrets rotation * fix secret recreation concurrency * address greptile secrets followups * address greptile secrets reliability feedback * align secret store capabilities
1.2 KiB
1.2 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Secrets Module
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-05-19
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details dominate the product requirements
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for technical and product stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are framed as observable outcomes
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- Existing
elsa-extensionsbaseline and gaps are captured
Notes
- The PRD intentionally preserves compatibility with the existing simple provider concept while introducing the richer Orchard-style typed secret and store model.