* feat: add specification and quality checklist for Shell Reload API endpoints * feat: implement Shell Reload API endpoints and associated documentation * feat: enhance Shell Reload API documentation and add tasks for implementation phases * feat: implement Shell Reload API features with endpoints, interface contracts, models, and component tests * feat: update Shell Reload API responses and tests to reflect changes in error handling and response structure * Fix shell reload follow-up review issues (#7354) * Initial plan * Address shell reload review feedback Co-authored-by: sfmskywalker <938393+sfmskywalker@users.noreply.github.com> * Dispose shell reload semaphore Co-authored-by: sfmskywalker <938393+sfmskywalker@users.noreply.github.com> * Harden shell reload follow-up fixes Co-authored-by: sfmskywalker <938393+sfmskywalker@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sfmskywalker <938393+sfmskywalker@users.noreply.github.com> * Update src/modules/Elsa.Workflows.Api/Endpoints/Shells/Reload/Endpoint.cs Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Potential fix for pull request finding 'Missed opportunity to use Where' Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Update src/modules/Elsa.Workflows.Api/Endpoints/Shells/Reload/Endpoint.cs Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: sfmskywalker <938393+sfmskywalker@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Shell Reload API Endpoints
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-08 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation completed on 2026-03-08 against the current spec.
- The spec intentionally records the temporary compatibility behavior for targeted reload in outcome-oriented terms without prescribing implementation details.