elsa-core/test/unit/Elsa.UserTasks.Persistence.ConformanceTests
Sipke Schoorstra 292e4bd3ea
feat(user-tasks)!: migrate endpoints to structured permissions (#7999)
Re-authors the nine User Tasks permissions as verbs on the user-tasks and
user-tasks/participants resources with a descriptor provider, replacing the
legacy verb:resource strings (UserTasksPermissions is removed along with the
other legacy constant classes). All 17 endpoints declare access through
RequirePermission, and UserTaskActor.HasPermission matches through
PermissionMatcher instead of string equality, so pattern grants reach these
endpoints for the first time. manage:user-tasks becomes user-tasks:supervise
to reflect that it grants oversight, not an aggregate. The migration guide
and contract specs carry the full mapping.

BREAKING CHANGE: legacy user-tasks permission strings no longer authorize
anything. Rewrite grants using the mapping table in
doc/migrations/authorization-model.md.

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 12:06:52 +02:00
..
Faults test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
Infrastructure test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
Providers test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
ConformanceCoverageTests.cs test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
Elsa.UserTasks.Persistence.ConformanceTests.csproj test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
ProviderConformanceSuites.cs test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
README.md test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
UserTaskConformanceTestBase.cs test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
UserTaskFaultInjectionConformanceTests.cs feat(user-tasks)!: migrate endpoints to structured permissions (#7999) 2026-08-27 12:06:52 +02:00
UserTaskGuestSessionConformanceTests.cs test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
UserTaskInvitationOutboxConformanceTests.cs test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00
UserTaskRepositoryConformanceTests.cs test(user-tasks): add a persistence conformance suite with fault injection (#7986) 2026-08-25 04:36:18 +02:00

User Tasks persistence conformance suite

One suite, run unchanged against every implementation of the User Tasks persistence contracts. It exists because the User Tasks build shipped four P1 defects that a single-threaded, happy-path, in-memory test suite could not see — every one of them was found by injecting a failure against a real store.

What it covers

Contract Suite Implementations
IUserTaskRepository UserTaskRepositoryConformanceTests InMemory, EF Core, VNext
IUserTaskGuestSessionIssuer UserTaskGuestSessionConformanceTests InMemory, EF Core
IUserTaskInvitationOutbox UserTaskInvitationOutboxConformanceTests InMemory, EF Core
The services above them UserTaskFaultInjectionConformanceTests InMemory, EF Core

UserTaskFaultInjectionConformanceTests runs the real DefaultUserTaskManager and DefaultUserTaskInvitationService against a real store and breaks the seams between them with the decorators in Faults/. A cross-store operation must either commit fully or leave the caller able to retry, and the retry must converge.

Providers

Availability is resolved once per run by ConformanceProviders, and nothing is ever skipped quietly:

  • Always run: in-memory, EF Core over SQLite, VNext over the SQLite document store.
  • Opt in with a connection string: SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Oracle. Each test reports as skipped, with the reason, when the variable is unset — not as passed.
  • Not coverable: MySQL. Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql 9.0.0 caps Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational at 9.0.x while this repository targets 10.0.9, so Elsa.UserTasks.Persistence.EFCore.MySql cannot be referenced from a test project at all (NU1107).
ELSA_USERTASKS_TEST_POSTGRES="Host=localhost;Database=elsa_conformance;Username=elsa;Password=elsa" dotnet test test/unit/Elsa.UserTasks.Persistence.ConformanceTests

The remaining variables are ELSA_USERTASKS_TEST_SQLSERVER and ELSA_USERTASKS_TEST_ORACLE.

Point them at a disposable database. The suite migrates the schema and isolates each test with its own tenant, but it never drops the database — that is deliberate, so it can never delete something an operator cared about.

ConformanceCoverageTests always runs. It fails if a provider that must run is unreachable, fails if a variable is set but empty (configured on the CI job, gating nothing), and writes the full matrix to the test output and to user-task-conformance-coverage.md in the output directory.

Adding a provider

  1. Add a ConformanceProvider entry to ConformanceProviders.All.
  2. Add a fixture under Providers/.
  3. Add a collection and one concrete class per contract in ProviderConformanceSuites.cs, each carrying [ConformanceProvider(...)].

A conformance class without [ConformanceProvider] is skipped with a wiring error rather than counted as coverage — the suite refuses to guess which provider a class exercised.