* fix(external-auth)!: match permission grant boundaries as patterns
The deployment allow/deny boundary and the delegation authorizer compared
permission strings with ordinal equality, so under the {resource}:{verb}
vocabulary they could not see wildcards. A deny list naming
'workflows/*:delete' did not deny 'workflows/definitions:delete', and a grant
of 'workflows/*:delete' outflanked a deny naming that leaf.
The bypass was reachable. ElsaRolePermissionGrantSource passes a role's
permissions to the boundary verbatim, survivors land in the issued token as
permission claims, and PermissionEvaluator does expand wildcards there. So an
ordinary role plus a deny list was enough, on every external sign-in, with no
privileged actor involved. Restoring the ordinal boundary under the new tests
fails seven of them.
Deny is now matched in both directions, allow one-directionally, both through
PermissionMatcher. A grant that is not a well-formed permission is dropped
with a warning rather than carried into a token it cannot authorize anything
in.
Five non-endpoint checks -- delegation, role-reference removal, unsafe
settings confirmation, the recovery override and the boundary itself -- also
still compared against the legacy ExternalAuthenticationPermissions
constants. Those carry two colons, so Permission.TryParse rejects them and no
principal can hold one, while the migration guide tells operators to replace
exactly those strings. All five now route through IPermissionEvaluator, and
the module registers AddElsaAuthorization itself instead of depending on host
ordering.
Non-core verbs move to ExternalAuthenticationVerbs, declared beside the
resources they apply to so a delegation check cannot spell one differently
from the endpoint it guards.
Refs #7982
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* style: apply IDE code cleanup to the diagnostics and identity modules
Redundant namespace qualifiers and usings removed, and primary-constructor
and record syntax applied, across Elsa.Diagnostics.ConsoleLogs,
Elsa.Diagnostics.StructuredLogs, Elsa.Expressions.JavaScript and
Elsa.Identity. Produced by a solution-wide IDE cleanup that ran alongside the
authorization work; separated from it so the permission changes can be
reviewed on their own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(hosts): boot both hosts and assert their gated routes challenge
This repo runs two parallel feature systems, the classic Features/ path and
the CShells ShellFeatures/ path, and every module has to register in both.
Nothing exercised either. The unit and integration suites construct services
directly, so a module registered in one path and not the other, or a service
missing from one container, passes every test and fails only when a host
starts. Three bugs in #7980 were found by running these two hosts by hand,
two of them shell-versus-classic divergences.
Each host is booted through WebApplicationFactory, running its real Program
with full feature registration, and asked for a handful of routes it is
expected to serve behind a permission. A 404 means the module was never
registered, a 5xx means the endpoint was found but its dependencies could not
be constructed, and a 200 means no gate ran; only 401 passes. All routes are
reported together, so a feature system that stops registering a group of
modules reads as one failure rather than a queue of identical ones.
Removing AddExternalAuthenticationServices from the shell feature -- the
divergence this is built to catch -- fails the shell host on all five of its
routes while the classic host stays green.
The assertions go through HTTP rather than the container on purpose. The
hosts have different topologies: the classic host's root provider holds
everything and registers 125 routes, while CShells gives each shell its own
provider and mounts routes per shell, leaving 6 in the root. A container or
route-table assertion would have to encode that difference and would break
whenever CShells changed internally. Behaviour at the edge is host-agnostic,
and it is what actually has to match.
Each host gains a namespaced entry-point marker because both already declare
a Program in the global namespace, which a test project referencing both
cannot tell apart.
Coverage is off for this project: it references both hosts, so every module
either pulls in would enter its denominator without adding real coverage, and
coverlet cannot instrument a graph that size. TreatAsLocalProperty keeps CI's
/p:CollectCoverage=true from overriding that.
Refs #7982
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(external-auth)!: fail closed on an unparseable grant boundary
Two findings from review, both real.
The grant boundary parsed its allow and deny lists and silently dropped what
would not parse. An allow list of nothing but malformed entries therefore
reduced to an empty set, and an empty allow list means unrestricted -- so a
typo turned the boundary off entirely and let external grant sources put
permissions straight into issued tokens. The deny side had the mirror of it:
a malformed entry quietly stopped denying what it named.
A boundary that does not parse now admits nothing, and
ExternalAuthenticationOptionsValidator rejects the configuration at startup,
so the mistake reaches an operator rather than a token. Failing startup is
what makes the runtime behaviour safe to be strict about: it cannot be hit by
someone mid-edit, only by validation having been bypassed.
ConnectionEndpointSupport.HasPermission was a sixth ad-hoc permission check,
missed when the other five were converted. It compared claim values against
the legacy ExternalAuthenticationPermissions constants at four call sites --
policy management on create and update, session revocation, and unsafe
settings confirmation -- and those constants carry two colons, so nothing can
hold one once a deployment follows the migration guide. It now routes through
IPermissionEvaluator like the rest, resolved from the request with a fallback
to the shared evaluator, the same way EndpointSecurity does it.
Refs #7982
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* style(external-auth): filter permission patterns with Where
Addresses a review nit on ValidatePermissionPatterns. Behaviour is unchanged:
a null list still iterates nothing, only malformed entries are reported, and
the message text is identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(external-auth)!: apply the grant boundary to role permissions too
Token issuance concatenated the user's Elsa role permissions raw alongside
the boundary-filtered external grants. A permission the boundary had just
excluded during grant resolution therefore reappeared in the issued token
from the same roles, which made the deny list unenforceable for anything a
role carried and left ElsaRolePermissionGrantSource filtering nothing that
was not added back a moment later. The bypass did not even need that grant
source configured: role permissions reached the token regardless of which
sources a connection selected.
Both origins now pass the same boundary. Re-applying it at issuance also
picks up a boundary that changed since sign-in, since refreshing reissues.
This is a behaviour change for deployments that configured a boundary
expecting it to bound only claim-mapped permissions: an external login may
now carry fewer permissions than before. Deployments with no boundary
configured, the default, are unaffected -- every well-formed permission
passes. The migration guide describes both directions.
Refs #7982
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
88 lines
4.3 KiB
C#
88 lines
4.3 KiB
C#
using System.Net;
|
|
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;
|
|
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing;
|
|
|
|
namespace Elsa.Hosts.SmokeTests;
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Boots a host the way its own entry point does and asserts it comes up serving gated routes.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
/// <remarks>
|
|
/// This repo runs two parallel feature systems -- the classic <c>Features/</c> path and the CShells
|
|
/// <c>ShellFeatures/</c> path -- and every module must register in both. Nothing exercised either until
|
|
/// now: the unit and integration suites construct services directly, so a service missing from one path,
|
|
/// or a feature registered in one and not the other, passes every test and fails only when a host starts.
|
|
/// Three such bugs in #7980 were found by running these two hosts by hand.
|
|
/// <para>
|
|
/// Each host is booted through <see cref="WebApplicationFactory{TEntryPoint}"/>, which runs the real
|
|
/// <c>Program</c> with its full feature registration. Assembling a service collection here instead would
|
|
/// reproduce exactly the blind spot these tests exist to close.
|
|
/// </para>
|
|
/// <para>
|
|
/// The assertions go through HTTP rather than by resolving services out of the container. The two hosts
|
|
/// have genuinely different container topologies -- the classic host is flat, while CShells gives each
|
|
/// shell its own provider, so the module services are simply not in the root one -- and a test that
|
|
/// reached into either would have to encode that difference and would break whenever CShells changed its
|
|
/// internals. Behaviour at the edge is both host-agnostic and the thing actually worth pinning: whichever
|
|
/// feature system a host uses, the observable result has to be the same.
|
|
/// </para>
|
|
/// </remarks>
|
|
public abstract class HostSmokeTests<TEntryPoint>(HostFixture<TEntryPoint> host) : IClassFixture<HostFixture<TEntryPoint>>
|
|
where TEntryPoint : class
|
|
{
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Routes this host is expected to serve behind a permission. Each names a different module, so the
|
|
/// set doubles as an inventory of what this host's feature system is supposed to have registered.
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
protected abstract IReadOnlyCollection<string> GatedRoutes { get; }
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void HostStarts()
|
|
{
|
|
// Touching Services forces the host to be built, which is where a feature that fails to register or
|
|
// an option that fails validation throws.
|
|
Assert.NotNull(host.Services);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public async Task EveryGatedRouteChallengesInsteadOfFailing()
|
|
{
|
|
using var client = host.CreateClient();
|
|
var problems = new List<string>();
|
|
|
|
foreach (var route in GatedRoutes)
|
|
{
|
|
var status = (int)(await client.GetAsync(route)).StatusCode;
|
|
|
|
// Each way this can go wrong is a distinct bug, so they are named rather than collapsed into one
|
|
// "expected 401" message that leaves the reader to work out which failure they are looking at.
|
|
var problem = status switch
|
|
{
|
|
404 => "404: this host never registered the module serving it",
|
|
>= 500 => $"{status}: the endpoint was found but could not be activated, so a dependency is missing",
|
|
200 => "200: reachable without credentials, so no permission gate ran",
|
|
401 => null,
|
|
_ => $"{status}: expected 401"
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
if (problem is not null)
|
|
problems.Add($"{route} -> {problem}");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Every route is reported at once: when a feature system stops registering a group of modules, one
|
|
// failure per run turns a single cause into a queue of identical-looking investigations.
|
|
Assert.True(problems.Count == 0, $"{problems.Count} of {GatedRoutes.Count} gated route(s) did not challenge:{Environment.NewLine}{string.Join(Environment.NewLine, problems)}");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>Boots a host once per test class.</summary>
|
|
public class HostFixture<TEntryPoint> : WebApplicationFactory<TEntryPoint> where TEntryPoint : class
|
|
{
|
|
protected override void ConfigureWebHost(IWebHostBuilder builder)
|
|
{
|
|
// Both hosts refuse to start outside Development while the signing key is a known default. That is
|
|
// the guard working as intended, so the test satisfies it rather than configuring around it.
|
|
builder.UseEnvironment("Development");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|